The general root of bad writing style mainly lies in formalism and bureaucracy. We should vigorously advocate the atmosphere of studying problems and create a relaxed environment that encourages telling the truth and advocating telling new words.
Effectively correct bad writing style and speaking style.
When talking about writing articles, Mr. Lu Xun once put forward "eight rules", one of which is: "Don’t write hard when you can’t write". Nowadays, some leading cadres are not only arty and boastful, but also have nothing to talk about, ramble and groan.
In some places and units, in some meetings, the department leaders talked about the leaders in charge, the leaders in charge talked about the chief officials, and those who have two chief officials should talk about both, and all relevant leaders should show their faces and make a sound; For work guidance, let alone go deep into the fields, listen to all kinds of opinions, and even rush to talk about opinions, make comments and make demands before the wheels roll and read them through the glass; Many experiences show that there is no secret trick, that is, to grasp and roll up the sleeves according to laws and regulations, but we must "dig" out some new ideas and "dig" out some new practices; During the discussion, some people didn’t have so many real feelings, insights and practical strategies, and some participants even "filled seats" temporarily, but they also "others said that they couldn’t help talking" … This kind of speech was made without rice, and it was just for posing and brushing the sense of existence, just like "so-and-so’s visit here".
"Hard writing" means "hard writing" and "hard speaking" means "hard speaking". Comrade Mao Zedong believes that speeches and compositions should not only be "shorter and shorter", but also be "softer and softer". However, some comrades now love the "table of contents" in their speeches and compositions. No matter what they write or say, everything is "unwritten". The big one, two, three sets the small one, two, three, and the content is all-encompassing, and everything is essential, but nothing is thorough. Some pursue the idea of neat confrontation, and even strive for similar words in paragraphs. They are full of conceptual words and four or six sentences, trying to dig out the word and the word, and don’t want to "matter" and "reason". When "water" is squeezed, nothing is left. As the saying goes, "When you grind the grain, you should grind the rice, and when you speak, you should make sense.". If you don’t talk about "reason" or "reason", you can’t even convince yourself.
Leading cadres can "talk hard", but the audience will not "listen hard". Although some people at the meeting arrived, they were absent-minded; It seems to be listening, but in fact the right ear goes in and the left ear goes out; Some meeting "regulars" simply put the materials into loose-leaf books so that they can "get it done" during the meeting. There are even some video conferences, which require all subordinates at all levels to participate at every turn. The superiors will open at different levels and the subordinates will accompany them at different levels, several times a week and several hours at a time. Who has counted this kind of "empty account"? If the audience refuses to listen, it is equal to through flow! Apart from those who listened to the meeting, they also suffered from those who wrote the manuscript. It is no exaggeration to say that the speech they delivered word by word is "a word of gold". What benefits can be produced in the end, no one can tell.
Leading cadres are "public servants" and the masses are masters. If a leading cadre thinks "what kind of person I am" in his bones, his master and servant are upside down and arrogant, it is inevitable that "I will talk if I want to, and you have to listen if you don’t listen". Leading cadres talk nonsense, preach empty words, and speak without words, just like Lenin criticized "a pile of useless garbage" to fill other people’s minds. Since you want to talk, talk something new, or don’t talk. The leading group of Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference government organs once asked Deng Xiaoping to make an opening speech at the Fourth Session of the Fifth CPPCC, and he explicitly instructed: "No opening speech" because "there is nothing to say". We have to do the same. If we want to talk about it, we must talk about our own experiences and thoughts. To do this, we must study theory, go deep into practice, investigate and study, ponder over it repeatedly, and make careful preparations. We are not afraid of cooking oil with a light, and we will not hesitate to make a thorough study, and then we will speak it out or write it out.
?
?
关于作者